Both patent and brand protection leaders face mounting complexity, from accelerated threats caused by emerging technologies to rising global counterfeiting and shifting enforcement standards. The need for clarity, transparency, and direct engagement with the USPTO has never been greater.
• Hear up-to-date insight into working effectively with the USPTO
• Gain clarity on complex emerging issues impacting portfolio management and enforcement.
• Ask a question to a senior UPSTO representative on the future of in-house IP in the US, including practical advice on how to align your IP strategy with the USPTO to remain close strategic partners.
Counterfeit and ‘dupe’ products have become a defining challenge for US athleisure brands. In contrast to automotive and pharmaceutical counterfeits, drawing law enforcement attention due to strong health and safety risks, dupe apparel rarely triggers agency action—leaving brand owners to develop innovative enforcement and protection strategies.
Explore advanced strategies for overcoming Section 102/112 patent rejections with expert prosecution counsel and USPTO examiners.
As the fight against brand abuse shifts ever deeper into the digital domain, strategies to pre-empt and counteract emerging threats such as mass infringement by bots, deepfake attacks, domain hijacks, and phishing campaigns, are imperative to protect your brand.
FRAND commitments are a cornerstone of licensing SEPs, but the US landscape is marked by legal uncertainty, global divergence, and increased litigation risk. Ongoing judicial inconsistency in determining FRAND terms creates unpredictability for both licensors and licensees.
Counterfeiters are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and supply chains ever more complex, making customs intelligence and collaboration an essential tool for brand protection leaders. Effective customs engagement programs can provide access to timely shipment data and convert seizures into strategic insights that strengthens overall brand protection efforts. By leveraging customs data, frontline insights and strategic partnerships with customs authorities, brands can proactively intercept counterfeit goods before they enter the market.
The landscape for IPR discretionary denial is in flux, following significant policy reversals and new memoranda reshaping how the USPTO and PTAB exercise their institution discretion. With guidance shifting under the Trump Administration and USPTO leadership, patent stakeholders are closely monitoring these developments, eager for clarity on how future decisions may unfold and how to recalibrate post-grant strategies.
Take part in quick, interactive lightning debates designed exclusively for IP leaders across both patent and brand protection functions. This session transforms networking into an engaging forum in an informal setting, quickly diving into some of the most pressing IP debates shaping your industries in 2026.
Debate topics include:
IP leadership is undergoing a significant transformation evolving from a tactical, cost-focused operation to an integrated, strategic function fundamental to organisational reputation, growth and innovation. However, many organisations still measure IP value with transactional outputs (eg. patents filed or granted, numbers of counterfeit seizures). This approach often fails to capture the broader, long-term business value IP brings.
In an era where the only constant is change, 2026 promises to bring a new era of rules, risks and opportunities, many of which remain hidden from plain sight today. With perspectives and forecasts shared from across IP functions and industries, equip yourself with a deeper understanding of the strategies to adopt and focuses to pursue in 2026 to effectively tackle likely policy shifts, global risks, and commercial opportunities to seize early-on.